Tag Archive | "attention"

Ashton Kutcher books extended stay with Airbnb

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


Airbnb, a service that pairs travelers seeking a unique experience with locals willing to rent out their spaces for a fee, is the latest startup to grab the attention of Ashton Kutcher.

The actor has invested a significant amount of money into the San Francisco based startup and will join its team as a strategic advisor, according to the company’s official blog. Kutcher’s role will involve enhancing Airbnb’s community engagement and expanding the service internationally.

Airbnb users have booked over a million reservations from the more than 60,000 listings available across the US and Europe, reports the New York Times.

Airbnb is hardly the only startup Kutcher has invested in, however it is reported to be the largest investment he’s made to date.

Such a financial commitment on Kutcher’s behalf, while likely to pale in comparison to Airbnb’s total funding of $7.82 million, could spark new interest in the company and propel it to success.

In the last few years, Kutcher has been gaining attention as an intelligent investor in the tech startup world. He’s put money into many hot new startups such as ticket event service SeatGeek; proximity-based, buyer-powered market Zaarly; airfare pricing site Hipmunk; mobile development lap Milk; and many more.

Tags:

Companies:

People:




Article courtesy of VentureBeat » deals

Short LNKD? FT Adds To Negative Barron’s Piece

Tags: , , ,


Shares of LinkedIn (LNKD) are down $6.47, or almost 7%, at $86.62 this morning, after steep gains on Thursday and Friday of last week, the stock’s first two days of trading.

Over the weekend, my colleague Andrew Bary wrote that the company would have a hard time growing into its stock valuation, fetching around 20 times possible 2011 revenue of $400 million.

A skeptical article appears as well this morning by Financial Times’s Michael Mackenzie and Telis Demos, who write that the stock is “expected to come under downward pressure this week, as they attract the attention of aggressive traders who are prepared to bet on a fall in the business network’s stock price.”

The authors cite remarks by, among others, Nicole Sherrod with TD Ameritrade who cites the “trending” interest in selling short LNKD. One hitch: the 9 million-share float, out of 94 million shares outstanding, could make borrowing difficult for shorts. Restrictions on shorting LNKD will be lifted tomorrow.

Article courtesy of Tech Trader Daily

Daily Style Phile: Model Andrej Pejic

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


via guestofaguest.com: Her beauty has been catching the attention of the modeling world in big way, and her androgynous look gives her a sexy edge, especially when topless, such as her image on Dossier Magazine which is being covered by bookstores. Keep reading for an uncensored look at rare beauty Andrej Pejic. MORE>>

Article courtesy of %source%

World’s Sassiest Shareholder Evelyn Davis Doesn’t Give A Rat’s Ass If Goldman Doesn’t Subscribe To Her Newsletter

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


She wasn’t even aware Lloyd et al canceled their $7,200 subscription until someone brought it to her attention. Why? Because she’s Evelyn fucking Davis and she drove an $80,000 BMW to get here tonight whereas you drove a Hyundai.

It turns out that Ms. Davis, 81, [an outspoken gadfly with a long history of haranguing corporate executives at annual meetings] may have another reason to dislike Mr. Blankfein: Goldman Sachs canceled its $7,200 subscription to her publication Highlights and Lowlights, according to a person briefed on the situation but not authorized to speak on the record…Ms. Davis, however, says while she is not a fan of Mr. Blankfein, she was unaware the firm had canceled its subscription. “I don’t keep up with that,” Ms. Davis said. “I am a multi-multimillionaire, and I don’t need anyone’s subscription.

…The newsletter is part vanity play, chock full of grinning pictures of Ms. Davis with corporate chiefs. It includes a letters to the editor section. One letter states: “Dear Evelyn: We missed YOU at OUR annual meeting.” It is signed “SEVERAL CEO’S!!!”. The newsletter is partially written in capital letters. Ms. Davis is also a big fan of the exclamation mark. “The euro could very easily go back to par with the dollar and even go lower!!!,” she wrote in her more recent edition.

As for Goldman- let’s just say that while this little stunt didn’t hurt Evelyn like you thought it would, there will be some “capital letters” and” exclamation marks” in your future. You people fucked with the wrong millionairess.

Goldman And The Gadfly [Dealbook]



Article courtesy of Dealbreaker

Crowdsourced design site 99designs raises $35M

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


99designs99designs, the popular site where startups and other small businesses can crowdsource their graphic design needs, has raised $35 million in a first round of funding from Accel Partners.

A first round of this size may seem like another sign of a venture capital bubble, but 99designs isn’t your typical early-stage investment. It was founded in February 2008, and has been bootstrapped and profitable until now. Customers can buy customizable logo designs off-the-shelf (metaphorically speaking) for just $99, or they can host design contests for things like logos and websites, where they only pay for the design that they like best.

99designs says that it has hosted more than 75,000 designs already and that it has paid designers $19 million to-date.

Accel is most famous for being an early investor in Facebook, but it has also succeeded in bringing relatively mature, bootstrapped companies into the venture capital fold in the past, most notably with Atlassian, a project-management company that raised a $65 million first round led by Accel last year. In fact, Atlassian and 99designs also share an Australian origin — 99designs is based in Melbourne and San Francisco.

Angle investors Michael Dearing, Dave Goldberg, Stewart Butterfield, and Anthony Casalena also participated in the round.

“99designs caught my attention when I realized that nearly every one of the early stage companies and entrepreneurs I work with was turning to them to get great design work done,” Dearing said in a press release. “The team has created a marketplace that is easy for companies to get onboard with, and also a boon for designers who can go after any of the hundreds of jobs open at any one time.”

Companies: ,




Article courtesy of VentureBeat » deals

Brian Hunter Ordered To Pay $30 Million For Manipulating Gas Prices

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,


A few years back, a hedge fund in Greenwich went out of business. Perhaps you’ve heard of it. Was called Amaranth Advisors. Was run by a guy named Nick Maounis. Had this lovable goof of a Canuck named Brian Hunter making natural-gas trades. Brian was always up for a good laugh and one day, on a lark, put on some trades that resulted in the firm losing, I don’t know, like $6.6 billion. It’s was hilarious! Maybe you had to be there, but I’m telling you, it was pant-pissingly funny. Definitely one of the best things to happen to the hedge fund community in a while.

Anyway, Maounis went on to start a new fund called Verition with most of the gang from the old shop, except for Hunter, who did some work for Peak Ridge Capital and also spent the last few years unsuccessfully fighting fighting what he believed was a bum rap re: market manipulation (on good, non-firm-destroying trades).

The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Thursday fined former Amaranth Advisors natural gas trader Brian Hunter $30 million — the highest penalty ever assessed by the agency — for what it said was his manipulation of the natural gas market in 2006. The agency imposed the fine after it agreed with the findings of an FERC administrative law judge, who ruled that Hunter artificially manipulated the closing prices of the NYMEX March, April and May 2006 gas futures contract to benefit offsetting positions he held on the IntercontinentalExchange. Hunter, who has maintained his innocence, was not immediately available for comment and was not at the proceeding.

This is the first time that the federal agency, which oversees the often mundane details of trading and pricing of electricity and natural gas, has taken a market-manipulation case before an administrative judge. In a statement, FERC said it found that “Hunter sold significant numbers of futures contracts” at times when the market was vulnerable to big price swings “with the intent to depress prices and financially benefit his significant derivative positions held on other platforms.” Susan Court, a lawyer who brought the case against Hunter when she led FERC’s Director of Enforcement and is now in private practice, called the
commission’s unanimous approval of the Hunter findings “huge,” adding “that litigation sets a precedent” that negotiated settlements cannot. She said the $30 million fine “will definitely get the attention of natural gas and electricity traders.”

US FERC fines former Amaranth gas trader Brian Hunter $30 million [Platt's]



Article courtesy of Dealbreaker

Securities And Exchange Commission Wants Everybody To Just Chill About This David Sokol Business

Tags: , , , , , ,


The SEC has put out a statement that the regulator does not view the David Sokol/Berkshire Hathaway/Lubrizol incident as an “urgent matter” in need of their attention, according to the Journal.



Article courtesy of Dealbreaker

DB At The Movies: Margin Call

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,


The following post is by Dealbreaker reader and commenter Infinite Guest.

“Margin Call” is not “Wall Street,” “Boiler Room,” or “Glengarry Glen Ross.” It’s not trying to be any of those. There are no fistfights, car chases or explosions. There are no dick jokes. Strippers, hookers and blow are alluded to, but remain off-screen. Despite the short time line and urgency of the situation, nobody races against a literal ticking clock. And the kind of person who hates “Star Wars” because sound doesn’t travel in a vacuum or who gave up on “Full Metal Jacket” when Pyle somehow managed to get a loaded gun off the range will not be able to sit through “Margin Call:” it requires some suspension of disbelief.

On the other hand, if you want to spend two hours reliving the feelings of despair and helplessness from 2008, this might just be your movie.

“Margin Call” takes place over a day and a half in the life of a major investment bank. Eric Dale, played by Stanley Tucci, is a lifer who is laid off in the opening scene. The head of risk for fixed income, he has been re-evaluating the firm’s exposure to interest rate volatility and is troubled by what he sees, but hasn’t quite finished his analysis. As security escorts him from the building he hands a USB flash drive containing his work to a subordinate, Peter Sullivan (Zachary Quinto, who also produced). That evening Sullivan completes the analysis and determines that under the prevailing level of volatility, the firm stands to lose over a trillion dollars. He calls head trader Will Emerson (Paul Bettany, who is excellent) to double-check his work. Emerson comes back, and he calls his boss, who calls his boss, who calls CEO John “Tuld” (Jeremy Irons). Sullivan presents his work at a late-night meeting where Tuld decides that to save the firm, the only option is to liquidate the firm’s MBS desk as soon as the markets open in the morning.

J. C. Chandor, the first-time filmmaker who wrote and directed, gives us something in the Soviet-instructional style. Chandor gives nearly all of his characters time to explain where they see themselves in the firm, the industry and the larger society. They are all recognizable “types.” Although their relationships are cold and superficial, their emotional range, actions, and even capacity to act are extremely limited, the very strong cast does a fine job fleshing them out.

Kevin Spacey turns in the strongest performance as Sales & Trading manager Sam Rogers. His is also the fullest role; it probably helps that Chandor’s father held a comparable position at Merrill. Sam’s dog “Ella” is dying of cancer at the start of the film and Rogers buries her at the end. Stanley Tucci also gives a moving performance.

Jeremy Irons plays Tuld as charming and cynical to the point of nihilism. But too detached. I would believe him as a CEO facing the prospect of slightly missing quarterly earnings, but in
this context, facing the bankruptcy of his firm and the imminent collapse of the global financial system, not even John Thain kept his cool. Demi Moore as Sarah Robertson, the Erin Callan-type character, is too vague. She projects fear well, and occasional petty anger, but Robertson does not appear capable of either risk or management. I don’t know whether the script, the direction, or Moore’s acting is to blame, but every CRO of a major investment bank has at least some appearance of competence. Simon Baker gives a nuanced performance as Sam’s boss and Robertson’s rival, ambitious and politically astute, in the mold of Jamie Dimon from his Travelers Group days. Zachary Quinto struck me as the Zoolander of quants. His most memorable moment comes early when he puts a USB flash drive in his mouth. I’ve never seen anyone do that. Rounding out the cast is Penn Badgley as second-year analyst Seth Bregman. Green, self-centered, obsessed with money, out of his depth on a good day and completely overwhelmed by the events taking place around him, Badgely fits the role perfectly and provides most of the very few lighter moments as the gravity of his unhappy circumstance sinks in.

Call me old-fashioned, but I like a movie whose characters make choices and live with results. Most of the emotional power in “Margin Call” comes from Mr. Chandor’s deliberate refusal to let that to happen. His characters have no options. They are all cogs in a machine that has ground them down and is about to spit them out. The only person who can make decisions is Tuld. There’s some validity to that portrayal. There was no shortage of fatalism in the days surrounding the Lehman Brothers collapse. There are touches of verisimilitude throughout. Production designer John Paino gets the look exactly right. And “Margin Call” may give us the closest thing we can ever expect to a sympathetic portrayal. Still, it would have been nice, and dramatic, to see someone try; to see someone actually struggle; to see someone put up at least a little bit of a fight despite the odds. Most of the film follows the action from Zoolander’s discovery of a fatal flaw in their risk management framework up the management chain to Tuld, who immediately chooses to get out before his competitors realize what’s happening. The rest is dénouement.

I saw it at the New Directors/New Films Festival, where the audience was engrossed. For all its lack of action it definitely holds your attention. It pulls off the neat trick of maintaining suspense despite inevitability.



Article courtesy of Dealbreaker

NYTimes Subscriptions Arrive: What’s With The $455 Top End?

Tags: , , , , , , ,


The New York Times (NYT) today officially unveiled their subscription service for digital editions, including the iPad app and other mobile device editions.

Times shares are jumping on the news, up 37 cents, or 4%, at $9.22.

The Times is setting three different options for subscriptions:

  • Using the Web site and getting full access on smartphones is $15 every four weeks, or $195, effectively, per year;
  • Using the Web site and a tablet program is $20 a month, or $260 a year, effectively;
  • Getting the whole enchilada is $35 a month, or $455 per year, effectively.

That compares, I would note, to home delivery of the print edition, which costs $23.40 in the New York City area, for example, which adds up to $281 per year.

Wait, something doesn’t make sense here: That last option at $455 seems rather bizarre. the Times is effectively charging you a la carte pricing for combined smartphone and tablet access, which makes it more expensive than just having the paper delivered to your home, even though home delivery of the paper gets you the same access to all the digital products. Would the Times really rather you just buy the print paper? For advertising purposes, perhaps they would.

The subscriptions entitle you to 100 articles from the archives each month.

The subscriptions go live worldwide on March 28th, although if you’re in Canada, you can sign up starting today, the company said.

In a win for Apple (AAPL), the Times said it would allow one-click purchasing through Apple’s App Store by June 30th, conforming with Apple’s demand that subscriptions be sold through its payment processing system.

Times CEO Janet Robinson remarked, “As the market for and delivery of digital content evolves, we believe that supplementing advertising revenue with digital subscription revenue makes tremendous sense.”

Lots of interesting questions here, especially the decision by the Times to let you read articles linked to from somewhere else. Is this a back door that could threaten subscriptions? I personally plan to subscribe, as the Times delivers some of the best reporting anywhere. But that $420 rate for the top end is rather too rich. It seems designed to shove you into a print subscription. Also, it’s not clear how much of the older articles will be accessible from the tablet and smartphone apps themselves.

I’m interested to hear others’ thoughts on the matter.

Update: In response to an inquiry I made with the Times regarding the disparity between full digital access at $420 per year and what seems to be the lower-priced print-plus-digital rate, a spokesperson responded in email, “The introduction of digital subscriptions and the fact that home delivery subscribers are being offered free access to all digital content obviously provides an added value to that home delivery.”

Update 2: As some readers have pointed out, the price I quoted above for home delivery is an introductory rate, after which price shoots up for the remainder of the subscription. And so, home delivery can actually be substantially higher than digital, especially in some markets that have higher delivery costs. The effective rate on a 52-week basis in New York City, for example, could be as much as $608 a year. However, I still find it odd that the Times is bundling together smartphone and tablet access at the full price per month of each product, rather than giving subscribers a break when they’re buying both.

Correction: The Times brings to my attention that the yearly totals should really reflect that subscriptions are billed “every four weeks,” so that on an annual basis, the various prices reflect 52 weeks, making them slightly higher than I’d previously suggested using a 12-month basis. Prices above have been changed to reflect this.

Article courtesy of Tech Trader Daily

Was One Morgan Stanley Employee Particuarly Upset About This Year’s Bonus? (Update)

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


Enough to take to LinkedIn and let it all out?

Update: “All, it has come to my attention that my account has been hacked and that some very derogatory comments have been posted. I would like to mention that these comments were not posted by me and that my account will be put into investigation to see who hacked my account. Thanks.”



Article courtesy of Dealbreaker