Tag Archive | "contrary"

AMD: ‘Llano’ Is On Track, Says Sterne Agee (Update)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Sterne Agee semiconductor analyst Vijay Rakesh this morning reiterated a Buy recommendation on shares of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), writing that he believes the company’s forthcoming “Llano” microprocessor will be shipping in April with major PC makers, including Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) and Acer, despite rumors to the contrary.

The 32-nanometer part will help improve AMD’s share in notebook computers, and should boost gross profit margin, when laptops running the chip arrive next quarter at U.S. retail, he believes.

AMD shares today are up 4 cents, or half a point, at $8.39.

Update: In a brief phone conversation, Rakesh reiterates that a second-quarter ship date has always been his expectation for Llano, consistent with what he’s heard from the company. He also says the company’s “Bulldozer” chip, which is currently in trials with customers, should ship in Q3. Rakesh raised his rating on AMD to Buy back on February 1st, in part on expectations around Bulldozer and Llano.

Article courtesy of Tech Trader Daily

Apple Aficionados?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Well in case if you were wondering if I ever get up from my desk, here’s evidence to the contrary, courtesy of this morning’s San Francisco Chronicle. In the photo, taken at yesterday’s Apple product launch event, that’s me in the middle; the Apple aficionado on the right is my [...]

Article courtesy of BARRONS.com: Tech Trader Daily

When Did UBS Whistle-Blower Bradley Birkenfeld Decide To Stick It To His Employers?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Former UBS banker Bradley Birkenfeld is the guy widely credited with helping the authorities crack down on the less than legal activities at the Swiss bank vis-a-vis clients and their taxes. For his help exposing the tax evasion specialists, he’s been rewarded with time in the big house, which is not how he’d predicted this whole thing would turn out. To the contrary, Brad and his big brain had assumed that not only would he do no time for his own wrong-doing (he had, after all, been one of those people helping clients keep some of their wealth on the hush-hush), but that he’d be looking at nice big check for a job well done signed by the Department of Justice. BUT WHY? Why did he go to the trouble of screwing the man, which involved a decent amount of effort when laying on the beach with a Thai hooker involves none? It probably had to do with the fact that he realized the man was going to screw him if he didn’t make some moves first.

On Oct. 5, 2005, high-flying American banker Bradley Birkenfeld abruptly resigned his plum position in the Geneva office of Switzerland’s premier financial institution, UBS. The sole reason, he said, was his discovery of an internal document that, in his mind, revealed a calculated plan on the bank’s part to disown him, or any one of his fellow cross-border bankers, should the music suddenly stop in UBS’ dubious $20 billion dance with America’s most wealthy. The offending document was an internal brief from UBS Legal that cataloged cross-border banking activities illegal in the United States, where Birkenfeld and the other private bankers in UBS’ wealth management division routinely made regular prospecting trips for wealthy U.S.-resident clients. The rub was that – point by point – the list of prohibitions contradicted the fundamentals of Birkenfeld’s job description: No establishing of business relationships “for securities purposes” the document read; no “solicitation of account opening” or “cold calling or prospecting;” and no contacting U.S. clients by “telephone, mail, email, advertising, the internet or personal visits.” “I’m like, ‘Holy shit, this is a stick of dynamite!’” Birkenfeld said.

While it could hardly have come as a surprise to a sophisticated banker that aiding wealthy U.S. residents in shielding billions in offshore accounts and corporate shells skirted the law, to see the bank essentially disown that business in a formal document raised burning concerns. “It was a sandbag job,” Birkenfeld said. Though the document was dated November 2004, six months prior to Birkenfeld’s discovery of it, none of the U.S. cross-border bankers had been told to stop what they were doing, Birkenfeld said. Quite the contrary: There were constant encouragements to book “new money” during the U.S. trips. When Birkenfeld went to his boss and demanded an explanation, the boss brushed him off and Birkenfeld blew his stack. “I said, ‘I’ll fucking go outside with you right now. I want some answers and I want them now.’”

Of course, as is typical with these people, the boss completely evaded in the question, which only made Birks angrier. That’s when this happened.

If Birkenfeld’s UBS bosses thought he would go quietly, they were wrong. Instead, he would gather a raft of damning UBS internal documents and fly to Washington, where he’d secretly arranged to meet with prosecutors from the U.S. Department of Justice.

Unfortunately, as we know, things didn’t pan out as Brad thought they would but if you’re thinking he regrets it all, you think wrong.

“They had never been able to crack this nut and I did it. I educated them,” he railed when I visited him in prison recently, dissing the DOJ team. Birkenfeld then suggested something more subtle: “I fucked so many politically powerful and wealthy people with this maneuver,” he said. “I was a whistle-blower, and they fucking hate that…I took on the biggest bank in the world and brought them down, and I took on the biggest government in the world and exposed their corruption, and I’m being rewarded with jail,” he said, squinting his deep blue eyes. Still, he added, “I would do it again.”



Article courtesy of Dealbreaker

Is Ken Lewis’s Wife Involved In A Pyramid Scheme?

Tags: , , , , , , , ,




That’s what some local Charlotte TV station is alleging, claiming that Donna Lewis has been working as a sales rep for FHTM, “a multi-level marketer recently fined as a pyramid scheme.” The wife of KL doesn’t deny working for the company but takes offense to the notion that anything illegal is going down. “It is truly not a pyramid,” Lewis said. “It’s helping people in this horrible economy make a living.”

Lady Lewis also added that despite reports to the contrary, her husband, who does have the time, is not working for the company. “He is not involved at all,” said Donna Lewis, adding, “If he thought it was wrong he would not let me be involved.” Not saying she’s guilty– and in fact this strikes us as more of the sort of thing Kathy Fuld would get caught up in– but I will note the Lewis’s have been looking to raise a little cash for some time now, and couch-bound KL isn’t exactly making it rain (though to be fair, the 10 cent refunds on bottles of Strawberry Hill really do add up so who knows).

“Pyramid scheme” recruits high profile sales reps [WCNC]

Article courtesy of Dealbreaker

In Defense of Raj Rajaratnam

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,




So your brother-in-law works at a major Wall Street bank that’s advising on a big corporate takeover. Now, let’s say he slips up at Thanksgiving dinner after downing too many martinis and gives you a hot tip about the pending deal. In Doug Bandow’s world, you should be able to trade, and profit, on that info without being afraid of ending up like “Martha f__ing Stewart” in the words of one Danielle Chiesi.

Here’s more from Bandow, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, via his Op-Ed in Barron’s over the weekend.

The distinction between public and non-public information is legally decisive but economically unimportant. Perversely, the insider-trading laws seek to prevent people from trading on the most accurate and up-to-date information. The law seeks to force everyone to make today’s decisions based on yesterday’s data. It’s a genuinely stupid thing to do.

Insider trading shouldn’t be a crime. There typically is no victim. To the contrary, most of us benefit when prices move more rapidly to the right level.

Unfortunately, prosecutors, regulators and politicians alike periodically demonize insider trading to justify their offices and budgets. But there is no reason to punish investors who trade on accurate information. In fact, that is precisely what the financial markets should encourage.

Article courtesy of Dealbreaker