Morgan Stanley analyst Ehud Gelblum today argues for splitting Cisco Systems (CSCO) into three parts, an access business, an enterprise routing and switching business, and a service provider routing and switching business.
Gelblum, who maintains an Equal Weight rating on Cisco shares, argues that despite the mea culpa from CEO John Chambers last month, and the company’s statement yesterday that it is making sweeping changes in its internal organization, the company’s problems are really structural in nature, and that it cannot successfully manage “disparate” businesses with different margins and growth.
Gelblum’s analogy is the heavy truck industry: in the ’20s through the ’50s, the same companies made cars and trucks. That changed later with the divergence in manufacturing of both, where different steel alloys were required for each, different stamping processes, different wiring harnesses, etc. Emissions standards, too, forced car makers to back away from trucks. Today, cars and trucks “share as little as 10% of their base technologies.”
I’d observe that Cisco has always been, to my mind, a software company, not a heavy iron company, but that’s debatable, I suppose.
In any event, the access products at Cisco, for example, Gelblum notes, are declining in sales, including the Scientific Atlanta set-top business, and the Linksys home and small business switch brand. They have $16.2 billion in revenue, 50% gross margin, and 10% operating margin.
Enterprise routing and switching has single-digit revenue growth, $22 billion in annual revenue, 80% gross margin, and nearly 40% operating margin.
And service provider is a $16 billion business with double-digit revenue growth, 50% gross margin, and 10% operating margin.
“We believe Cisco could successfully separate into three pieces, which we expect to result in a) narrower end-market focus for each more closely aligned with a distinct end-customer; and b) improved alignment between revenue growth and margin targets.”
Without such a change, Gelblum thinks Cisco’s long term financial targets of 12% to 17% revenue growth and 28% to 31% operating margin are unrealistic.
Mind you, Gelblum thinks Cisco’s three parts are altogether worth $173 billion, 40% above the current price. But that’s assuming some things: for one, he values the enterprise business on a dividend yield basis, assuming the company could make $5.3 billion annually in free cash flow and pay out two thirds of that, for a 4% dividend yield.
If one is a patient investor, there’s upside. However, “We do not believe Cisco’s heads are there yet and so believe it is too early to buy the stock on this thesis unless one can be very patient.” Emphasis is Gelblum’s.
Cisco shares today are up 14 cents, or 0.8%, at $17.62.
Article courtesy of Tech Trader Daily

Group-buying titan 
