Folks, just a heads up to let you know that many comments are unfortunately ending up in the spam filter of Tech Trader for no good reason. The problem appears to be something related to our blogging software platform, WordPress. That means that if you post a legitimate comment, it may not immediately appear until I have a chance to rescue it from the spam queue. Our techs are working to fix the problem. My apologies, in the meantime, if you see a delay in your comment appearing.

Article courtesy of Tech Trader Daily

As of this writing, online publisher Demand Media is worth more on the stock market than is The New York Times Company. Of course, this says more about the enthusiasm of IPO investors than it does about the relative merits of the two organizations, but given the overall level of terribleness of Demand’s product –mainly hastily written how-to articles aimed not at readers, but at search engines – it’s still a bit disheartening.

In afternoon trading, Demand shares were up by 35 percent, to about $23, after reaching a high of $25. They priced this morning at $17, above their range of $14 to $16. After expenses, Demand raised about $67 million in the offering.

Apparently, a number of investors believe that Demand will somehow thrive despite the company’s raw exposure to the whims of Google, which recently said it means to crack down on spammy content like Demand’s (though it didn’t mention Demand by name). A change in Google’s search algorithm could send Demand’s content way down in search results, which would cut deeply into Demand’s traffic. That could happen at any time, in a heartbeat.

While the IPO is clearly a success, the Wall Street Journal’s Deal Journal blog offers some perspective: the 20th largest tech IPO since Google’s 2004 market debut — that of Solera Holdings in 2007 — raised three times as much money as Demand did today.

Tags: content farms, content mills, IPO, search algorithms, spam

Companies: Demand Media, Google

Article courtesy of VentureBeat » deals

As of this writing, online publisher Demand Media is worth more on the stock market than is The New York Times Company. Of course, this says more about the enthusiasm of IPO investors than it does about the relative merits of the two organizations, but given the overall level of terribleness of Demand’s product –mainly hastily written how-to articles aimed not at readers, but at search engines – it’s still a bit disheartening.

In afternoon trading, Demand shares were up by 35 percent, to about $23, after reaching a high of $25. They priced this morning at $17, above their range of $14 to $16. After expenses, Demand raised about $67 million in the offering.

Apparently, a number of investors believe that Demand will somehow thrive despite the company’s raw exposure to the whims of Google, which recently said it means to crack down on spammy content like Demand’s (though it didn’t mention Demand by name). A change in Google’s search algorithm could send Demand’s content way down in search results, which would cut deeply into Demand’s traffic. That could happen at any time, in a heartbeat.

While the IPO is clearly a success, the Wall Street Journal’s Deal Journal blog offers some perspective: the 20th largest tech IPO since Google’s 2004 market debut — that of Solera Holdings in 2007 — raised three times as much money as Demand did today.

Tags: content farms, content mills, IPO, search algorithms, spam

Companies: Demand Media, Google

Article courtesy of VentureBeat » deals

The blogosphere is abuzz with complaints that Apple’s (AAPL) new Ping social networking feature in iTunes is awash in comment spam. As anyone who writes a blog can tell you, the worlds spammers and scammers are constantly on the hunt for new places to post their malevolent spewings; the spam [...]

Article courtesy of BARRONS.com: Tech Trader Daily