Shares of Intel (INTC) are up 38 cents, or 1.6%, at $23.93 following yesterday’s upbeat investor day meeting, during which CEO Paul Otellini and his team laid out for analysts how the company can profit from “cloud” computing and the smartphone and tablet wars.
As I noted yesterday, Intel made the case that mobile devices require more and more server resources, a plus for Intel given its healthy business in selling server microprocessors. The company also presented a time-line for its “Atom” mobile chips that suggested that future versions of the chips will not lag the company’s desktop chips by the typical two-year time frame, which might help Intel to close the gap at some point with chips from ARM Holdings (ARMH).
Today, Street research reflects those encouraged by Intel’s move, and those for whom it just wasn’t enough:
Bullish!
Glen Yeung, Citigroup: Reiterates a Buy rating and a $27 target price. He notes the company’s full-year revenue forecast included a model for $1.9 billion of software and services revenue, which is more than the $1.74 billion he’s been modeling. He also notes gross margin is expected to be at the upper end of Intel’s targeted range of 55% to 65%. As regards Intel’s Atom chip, the roadmap is on a fast track, but the 32-nanometer version of the chip, code-named “Saltwell,” will still lag 28-nanometer chips by ARM, he argues. But the 32-nanometer part at least, “puts Intel within striking range of making headway in the smartphone market, and allows them to pilot a design with partners. The 22-nanometer “Silvermount” chip, coming in 2013, “will benefit from Intel’s tri-gate technology, where the greatest performance gains occur in low power settings.”
Uche Orjii, UBS Investment Research: Reiterates a Buy rating and a $28.50 price target. Among the things he came away with was that ARM may have a hard time breaking into the PC market, given lack of legacy compatibility for applications; Intel will use its 22-nanometer Atom chips for a server line at some point; Intel’s “software ecosystem can well support porting of native ARM apps.”
Christopher Danely, JP Morgan: Reiterates an Overweight rating and a $25 price target. He writes that the PC markeontinue to be the driver for most of Intel’s revenue. He doesn’t buy Intel’s forecast, however, that PC growth in units can rise to a rate of 14%, year over year. “The PC market has been benefitting from emerging market growth for many years.” He sees more of a long-term growth rate of 11%, he writes. Danely “loves the higher dividend,” which Intel intends to increase from a 33% payout ratio as a measure of free cash flow to 40%. “We expect Intel’s dividend to remain above 3% going forward, well above the average yield of 1.8% for our semi universe.”
N. Quinn Bolton, Needham & Co.: Reiterates a Buy rating and a $26 price target. The company “is seeing strong growth across all businesses, is investing to lead across all segments of computing and continues to return exceptional value to shareholders,” he writes. “We come away from the analyst day encouraged that the company is taking all the right steps to maintain its manufacturing lead and to become a player outside traditional computing form factors. As the growth of mobile connected devices and embedded computing explodes, Intel will present an excellent value proposition to its customers.”
Tristan Gerra, R.W. Baird & Co.: Reiterates an Outperform rating and a $29 price target. The “Medfield” Atom processors suggest the company’s got the goods to compete with ARM. “Medfield’s benchmark tests highlight a very
competitive power envelope with ARM-based architectures.” He concludes, “Intel’s strong fundamentals, core manufacturing strength, flawless execution of late, and end-market diversification (notably ultra-mobile) next year warrant multiple expansion, in our view.”
Bearish!
Alex Gauna, JMP Securities: Reiterates a Market Perform rating and a $27.50 target price, describing the event as “well executed but uneventful.” The company did a good job of showing “commitment” to pursuing the advantages it has in process technology. However, its pursuit of the smartphone and tablet markets look “as disjointed as ever.”
Christopher Caso, Susquehanna Investment Group: Reiterates a Neutral rating and a $21 price target. “We left the INTC analyst day with a view that INTC clearly understands the market shifts that are underway in the PC and mobile markets, and it is actively taking steps to position the company to maintain a leadership position, particularly in low power, where it is currently behind. However, our concern is not that INTC will not outperform the competition, but rather that the playing field is becoming more level, which will make it difficult for INTC to enjoy its current pricing and margin premium, even if it does maintain a performance advantage.”
Stacy Rasgon, Sanford Bernstein: Maintains a Market Perform rating and a $24 price target. The company’s financial targets imply revenue growth exceeding 15% per year through 2013, he writes, which is “aggressive” compared to his own estimates and the consensus. Rasgon questions the logic Intel applied to emerging markets, in which more and more people are earning the money they need to buy the PC in a shorter amount of time, which, the company argues, portends continued PC growth in those markets. “However, we are unsure whether or not prior relationships (observed in developed markets) will continue to hold to such a degree, as a multitude of different form factors (e.g. tablets and, potentially more importantly, smartphones) exist today (and did not when PC penetration was inflecting in current developed markets a decade or so ago).”
Article courtesy of Tech Trader Daily